Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1909

Hickson Lumber Co. v. Gay Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided March 17, 1909 · Brown

150 N.C. 281

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

National Surety Corp. v. Sharpe (N.C. 1952)
Yates v. . Yates (N.C. 1915)
Hickson Lumber Co. v. Gay Lumber Co. (N.C. 1910)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Brown, J.

In his final decree in this cause.his Honor, Judge Neal, in the exercise of his discretion, assessed these appellants with a considerable part of the costs of this proceeding. In doing so, we think he.was in error, for he was not vested with any such discretionary power.

This is not an action brought under the general equity powers of the court, assuming that there may be such an action) but it is a statutory proceeding, brought to wind up the affairs of an insolvent corporation and distribute its- assets to those who are entitled according to priority, and the payment of costs is governed by the statutes.

The appellants are first-mortgage creditors, the priority of whose debts is established over the general creditors and over plaintiff appellee’s mortgage. (See opinion in this case, this term.)

Section 1207 of the Revisal prescribes, specifically: “After the payment of all allowances, expenses and costs, and the satisfaction of all special and general liens upon the funds of the corporation to the extent of their lawful priority, the creditors *282shall be paid proportionately to the amount of their respective debts,” etc. Again,.section 1226 prescribes: “Before distribution of the assets of an insolvent corporation among the creditors or stockholders; the court shall allow a reasonable compensation to the receiver for his services and the costs and expenses of administration of his trust, and the .costs of the proceedings in said court to be'first paid out of said assets.” The effect of such legislation is to take from the funds of the insolvent corporation a sufficient sum to pay all the costs,, allowances and legitimate expenses, and then to distribute what is left according to priority. .

So much of the judgment of the Superior Court as taxes any part of the costs against the appellants is reversed, and the cause is remanded, with direction to tax the costs’in accordance with this opinion.

Let the appellee, the Hickson Lkmber Company, pay the costs of this appeal.

Reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.