Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1912

Hare v. . Grantham

Hare v. . Grantham
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided March 20, 1912 · PER CURIAM.
74 S.E. 102; 158 N.C. 598; 1912 N.C. LEXIS 96 (South Eastern Reporter)
Hare v. . Grantham

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

It is admitted that the case on appeal was not served within the time required by law, and therefore has not been sent up to this Court with the record.

The plaintiffs move the Court to affirm the judgment upon the face of the record.

The defendant moves the Court to dismiss the action because on the face of the complaint no cause of action is stated.

The Court, being of opinion that a cause of action is stated in the complaint, and that there is no error apparent' upon the face of the record, allows the motion to affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.