Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1913

First National Bank v. Fries

First National Bank v. Fries
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided March 5, 1913 · PER CURIAM.
77 S.E. 227; 162 N.C. 516; 1913 N.C. LEXIS 382 (South Eastern Reporter)

First National Bank v. Fries

Opinion of the Court

Per CueiaM.

This is a motion to reinstate an appeal wbicb was dismissed at this term for failure to state tbe evidence in narrative form, and for other irregularities appearing in tbe record.

Tbe principal reason urged in support of tbe motion is tbat counsel for appellee agreed to tbe case on appeal; but this also appeared in Cressler v. Asheville, 138 N. C., 483; and in Bucken v. R. R., 157 N. C., 444, and while tbe appeals in those cases were not dismissed, it was stated in effect tbat counsel could not waive compliance with tbe rule, and tbat it would be enforced.

The motion must, therefore, be denied; but, while reaching .this conclusion, we have examined all of tbe assignments of error, and find nothing which justifies a new trial.

Motion denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.