Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1913

Potts v. Potts

Potts v. Potts
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided December 13, 1913
164 N.C. 385

Counsel

Maxwell & Kéerans for plaintiffs. , No counsel contra.

Potts v. Potts

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

If it be conceded that the plaintiff, as execu- ' trix of W. A. Potts, is entitled to the opinion and instructions of the court upon the questions • submitted in the complaint, we think the ruling of the court was correct, and that the proper construction has been placed upon the provisions of the will, which -is expressed very plainly, and seems to be free from any doubt.

The judgment is, therefore,

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.