Haar v. . Schloss
Haar v. . Schloss
83 S.E. 306; 168 N.C. 97; 1914 N.C. LEXIS 18
(South Eastern Reporter)
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Bethune v. New York Underwriters Ins. (District Court, E.D. South Carolina 1951)
- Murdaugh v. Traders & Mechanics Ins. Co. (S.C. 1950)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
It appearing from an inspection of the record that it is necessary for the heirs at law of Mary Christ to be made parties in this action, in order that an adjudication binding upon all persons interested in the land shall be made, it is ordered that the action be remanded, to the end that said heirs be made parties.
Eemanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.