Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1915

Burris v. Burris

Burris v. Burris
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided April 28, 1915 · Curlam
169 N.C. 247

Counsel

H. H. McLendon, I. B. Burleson for plaintiff. , Walter E. Brock, Bobinson, Caudle & Bruette for interpleader.

Burris v. Burris

Opinion of the Court

Per Curlam.

In the brief of the appellant the several exceptions relating to the admissibility of evidence are withdrawn. The only assignment of error is as follows: β€œThe court erred in rendering judgment as set out in the record.” We must assume, in the absence of any exeep-*248tions to tbe evidence, or to tbe charge of tbe judge, tbat tbe findings of tbe jury are correct. Tbat being so, we are of opinion tbat sucb findings fully warrant tbe judgment rendered.

No error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.