Chancey v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
Chancey v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
88 S.E. 346; 171 N.C. 756; 1916 N.C. LEXIS 164
(South Eastern Reporter)
Chancey v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
Opinion of the Court
Allowing tbe amendment to the summons was a matter witbin the sound discretion of the judge. The summons had been served on the agent of the Norfolk and Western Railway. The original summons was directed, to the Norfolk and Western Railroad. His Honor very properly allowed the amendment. As the court ordered an alias summons, no question of jurisdiction or venue arises now. The order amending summons- and ordering an alias is not appealable. -
Appeal dismissed..
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.