The first, second, seventh, and tenth exceptions relating to the incorporation into the issues and the charge of the element of knowledge on the part of the insured of the disease of which it is alleged she died, cancer of the womb, at the time of the application for insurance, become immaterial in view of the finding of the jury in answer to the second issue, that the insured did not have cancer of the womb at the time of making her application.

The third, fourth, and fifth exceptions are abandoned in the brief.

The sixth and ninth exceptions are to statements madp by his Honor that he did not recall any witness saying the insured died of cancer of the womb. No exception was made to these remarks at the time, and his Honor further charged:

“You must not be guided by my recollection of the testimony or by the recollection of counsel. You must be guided by your own recollection. You are the sole judges of what the witnesses said and the sole judges of what credit is to be given the testimony of the witnesses.”

We see nothing in this to prejudice the cause of the defendant.

The eighth exception is that his Honor confined the representations to cancer of the womb; but the answer to this is that the pleadings, the evidence, and the issue tendered by the defendant show that the only representation relied on to avoid the policy was that she did not have cancer of the womb.

We have carefully examined the record, and find

No error.