We have carefully examined this case, and can see no error in it which is sufficient ground for a reversal of the judgment. The ruling of the judge upon the evidence appears to be correct, and when the other exceptions are- considered, we agree with the court that there was not any evidence which could be held as sufficient in law to support a verdict.for the plaintiff; and the judgment of nonsuit was properly allowed. This would still be our conclusion if the rejected evidence had been admitted.

No error.