Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /North Carolina /Cases /Supreme Court of North Carolina /

1920

322 Supreme Court of North Carolina opinions from 1920.

  • Howe v. . Hand 104 S.E. 38, (N.C. 1920)
  • State v. . Sykes 104 S.E. 83, (N.C. 1920)
  • Hamilton v. . Benton 104 S.E. 78, (N.C. 1920)
  • Davis v. North Carolina Shipbuilding Co. 104 S.E. 82, (N.C. 1920)
  • State v. . Cole 104 S.E. 136, (N.C. 1920)
  • Dunning v. . Powell 104 S.E. 73, (N.C. 1920)
  • Planters Stores Co. v. Bullock 104 S.E. 65, (N.C. 1920)
  • Starr v. . O'Quinn 104 S.E. 66, (N.C. 1920)
  • Thomas v. County of Carteret 104 S.E. 75, (N.C. 1920)
  • Lee v. . Lee 104 S.E. 76, (N.C. 1920)
  • Spruill v. Branning Manufacturing Co. v. Branning Manufacturing Co. 103 S.E. 911, (N.C. 1920)
  • Newby v. Atlantic Coast Realty Co. 103 S.E. 909, (N.C. 1920)
  • Hudnell v. East Carolina Lumber Co. 103 S.E. 893, (N.C. 1920)
  • Williams v. Farmers Manufacturing Co. 104 S.E. 31, (N.C. 1920)
  • State v. . Hoggard 103 S.E. 891, (N.C. 1920)
  • Nash v. Elizabeth City Hospital Co. 104 S.E. 33, (N.C. 1920)
  • Berry v. . Boomer 103 S.E. 914, (N.C. 1920)
  • Penniman v. . Winder 103 S.E. 908, (N.C. 1920)
  • Midgett v. Eastern Carolina Transportation Co. 104 S.E. 32, (N.C. 1920)
  • Oliver v. . Veneer Co. 103 S.E. 893, (N.C. 1920)
  • Edwards v. . White 103 S.E. 901, (N.C. 1920)
  • In Re Tart 104 S.E. 65, (N.C. 1920)
  • Hassell v. . Daniels 103 S.E. 897, (N.C. 1920)
  • Dudley v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad 103 S.E. 905, (N.C. 1920)
  • Thompson v. American Railway Express Co. 103 S.E. 898, (N.C. 1920)
  • Cohoon v. . Harrell 103 S.E. 906, (N.C. 1920)
  • State v. . Willoughby 103 S.E. 903, (N.C. 1920)
  • Carstarphen v. Town of Plymouth 103 S.E. 899, (N.C. 1920)
  • Washington Horse Exchange Co. v. Bonner 103 S.E. 907, (N.C. 1920)
  • Paul v. . Burton 103 S.E. 37, (N.C. 1920)
  • Bargain House v. . Jefferson 103 S.E. 922, (N.C. 1920)
  • Leroy v. . Saliba 103 S.E. 921, (N.C. 1920)
  • Swift & Co. v. New Bern Produce Co. 103 S.E. 889, (N.C. 1920)
  • In Re Bennett 103 S.E. 917, (N.C. 1920)
  • Harrison v. . Daw 103 S.E. 900, (N.C. 1920)
  • Powell v. Hookerton Terminal Co. 103 S.E. 892, (N.C. 1920)
  • Cherry v. L. J. Upton & Company 103 S.E. 912, (N.C. 1920)
  • Kerr Grain & Hay Co. v. Marion Cash Feed Co. 103 S.E. 375, (N.C. 1920)
  • Board of Trustees of Plymouth Graded School District v. Pruden & Co. 103 S.E. 369, (N.C. 1920)
  • Highway Commission v. . Central Commission 103 S.E. 744, (N.C. 1920)
  • State v. . Alexander 103 S.E. 383, (N.C. 1920)
  • Davis v. Kessawayne Lumber Co. 103 S.E. 371, (N.C. 1920)
  • Culbreth v. . Martin 103 S.E. 374, (N.C. 1920)
  • State v. . Beam 103 S.E. 370, (N.C. 1920)
  • Mauney v. . Norvell 103 S.E. 372, (N.C. 1920)
  • State v. . Hines 103 S.E. 374, (N.C. 1920)
  • English Lumber Co. v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. 102 S.E. 205, (N.C. 1920)
  • Lamb v. . R. R. Co. 103 S.E. 440, (N.C. 1920)
  • Hall v. . Giessell 103 S.E. 392, (N.C. 1920)
  • Herbert v. Union Development Co. 103 S.E. 380, (N.C. 1920)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑