Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /North Carolina /Cases /Supreme Court of North Carolina /

1922

460 Supreme Court of North Carolina opinions from 1922.

  • Meadows v. Mann 184 N.C. 630, (N.C. 1922)
  • State v. Mills 184 N.C. 694, (N.C. 1922)
  • State v. Bell 184 N.C. 701, (N.C. 1922)
  • Soles v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad 114 S.E. 305, (N.C. 1922)
  • State v. . Bradshaw 114 S.E. 161, (N.C. 1922)
  • In re Blake 114 S.E. 300, (N.C. 1922)
  • Wilson v. Commissioners of Bladen County 114 S.E. 294, (N.C. 1922)
  • Owen v. Board of Education of Cumberland County 114 S.E. 390, (N.C. 1922)
  • State v. . Pulliam 114 S.E. 394, (N.C. 1922)
  • Horner v. Southern Railway Co. 114 S.E. 296, (N.C. 1922)
  • Burney v. . Comrs. 114 S.E. 298, (N.C. 1922)
  • State v. . Flowers 114 S.E. 289, (N.C. 1922)
  • Williams v. Fireman's Fund Insurance 114 S.E. 161, (N.C. 1922)
  • Pearsall & Co. v. Eakins 114 S.E. 291, (N.C. 1922)
  • Frank v. . Lefkowitz 114 S.E. 293, (N.C. 1922)
  • Burnet v. Commissioners of Bladen County 184 N.C. 274, (N.C. 1922)
  • State v. Pulliam 184 N.C. 681, (N.C. 1922)
  • State v. Flowers 184 N.C. 688, (N.C. 1922)
  • Temple v. . Laberge 114 S.E. 166, (N.C. 1922)
  • Byrd v. Georgia Casualty Co. 114 S.E. 1, (N.C. 1922)
  • State v. . Vickers 114 S.E. 168, (N.C. 1922)
  • Crutchfield v. . Rowe 114 S.E. 301, (N.C. 1922)
  • Motor Co. v. . Reaves 114 S.E. 175, (N.C. 1922)
  • Dixon v. . Davis 114 S.E. 8, (N.C. 1922)
  • Interstate National Bank of Kansas City v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co. 114 S.E. 164, (N.C. 1922)
  • Outlaw v. . Outlaw 114 S.E. 4, (N.C. 1922)
  • State v. . Mallard 114 S.E. 17, (N.C. 1922)
  • Harper v. Oak Ridge Supply Co. 114 S.E. 173, (N.C. 1922)
  • Leaksville Cotton Mills v. Commissioners of Rockingham County 114 S.E. 172, (N.C. 1922)
  • Bank of Proctorville v. West 114 S.E. 178, (N.C. 1922)
  • State v. . Thomas 114 S.E. 12, (N.C. 1922)
  • Bowen v. . Schnibben 114 S.E. 170, (N.C. 1922)
  • Lanier v. . Bryan 114 S.E. 6, (N.C. 1922)
  • Temple v. Eades Hay Co. 114 S.E. 162, (N.C. 1922)
  • Galloway v. Board of Education of Brunswick County 114 S.E. 165, (N.C. 1922)
  • Boseman v. . McGill 114 S.E. 10, (N.C. 1922)
  • Dailey Motor Co. v. Reaves 184 N.C. 260, (N.C. 1922)
  • Henderson v. . Forrest 114 S.E. 391, (N.C. 1922)
  • Dawson v. . Abbott 114 S.E. 15, (N.C. 1922)
  • State v. . Fulcher 113 S.E. 769, (N.C. 1922)
  • Miller v. Duke School District, No. 1 113 S.E. 786, (N.C. 1922)
  • Barrow v. Norfolk Southern Railroad 113 S.E. 785, (N.C. 1922)
  • Newbern v. . Leigh 113 S.E. 674, (N.C. 1922)
  • State v. . Jenks 113 S.E. 783, (N.C. 1922)
  • Mangum v. Mutual Grain Co. 114 S.E. 2, (N.C. 1922)
  • Vann v. . Winders 113 S.E. 927, (N.C. 1922)
  • Berry v. . Cedar Works 113 S.E. 772, (N.C. 1922)
  • Harrell v. . Brinkley 113 S.E. 770, (N.C. 1922)
  • Matthews v. Hudson Bros. 113 S.E. 780, (N.C. 1922)
  • Way v. Morehead City Sea Food Co. 113 S.E. 781, (N.C. 1922)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 … 10 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑