Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /North Carolina /Cases /Supreme Court of North Carolina /

1922

393 Supreme Court of North Carolina opinions from 1922.

  • Witty v. National Council of the Junior Order, United American Mechanics 111 S.E. 721, (N.C. 1922)
  • Moore v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Works 111 S.E. 776, (N.C. 1922)
  • Shell v. . Lineberger 111 S.E. 769, (N.C. 1922)
  • Mimms v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. 111 S.E. 778, (N.C. 1922)
  • R. R. v. . Dunn 111 S.E. 724, (N.C. 1922)
  • Bellamy v. Bladen County Lumber Co. 111 S.E. 773, (N.C. 1922)
  • Gaither v. . Clement 111 S.E. 782, (N.C. 1922)
  • State v. . Lippard 111 S.E. 722, (N.C. 1922)
  • Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Town of Dunn 183 N.C. 427, (N.C. 1922)
  • Gaither v. E. H. Clement Co. 111 S.E. 782, (N.C. 1922)
  • Hare v. . Hare 111 S.E. 620, (N.C. 1922)
  • Gibbon v. . Lamm 111 S.E. 618, (N.C. 1922)
  • Perry v. . Comrs. 112 S.E. 6, (N.C. 1922)
  • State v. . Sheffield 111 S.E. 617, (N.C. 1922)
  • Kendall v. Pinnix Realty Co. 111 S.E. 705, (N.C. 1922)
  • Griffith v. . Board of Education 112 S.E. 10, (N.C. 1922)
  • Berry v. Hyde County Land & Lumber Co. 111 S.E. 707, (N.C. 1922)
  • St. Sing v. American Railway Express Co. 111 S.E. 710, (N.C. 1922)
  • Gatewood v. . Fry 111 S.E. 712, (N.C. 1922)
  • Winder v. . Martin 111 S.E. 708, (N.C. 1922)
  • Teal v. . Liles 111 S.E. 617, (N.C. 1922)
  • Perry v. Commissioners of Bladen 183 N.C. 387, (N.C. 1922)
  • Sutton Ex Rel. Sutton v. Melton-Rhodes Co. 111 S.E. 630, (N.C. 1922)
  • Dorsett v. . Dorsett 111 S.E. 541, (N.C. 1922)
  • State v. . Winder 111 S.E. 530, (N.C. 1922)
  • Clemmons v. . Jackson 111 S.E. 609, (N.C. 1922)
  • Lacy v. . Bank 111 S.E. 612, (N.C. 1922)
  • State v. . Murdock 111 S.E. 610, (N.C. 1922)
  • Tyree v. . Tudor 111 S.E. 714, (N.C. 1922)
  • Evans v. Junior Order United American Mechanics 111 S.E. 526, (N.C. 1922)
  • Jones v. Union Guano Co. 111 S.E. 612, (N.C. 1922)
  • Power Co. v. . Mfg. Co. 111 S.E. 623, (N.C. 1922)
  • Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. L. Banks Holt Manufacturing Co. 183 N.C. 327, (N.C. 1922)
  • Tyree v. Tudor 183 N.C. 340, (N.C. 1922)
  • Lacy v. Fidelity Bank of Durham 183 N.C. 373, (N.C. 1922)
  • State v. . Strange 111 S.E. 350, (N.C. 1922)
  • Goodloe v. Fidelity Bank 111 S.E. 516, (N.C. 1922)
  • Hedgepeth Ex Rel. Hedgepeth v. Coleman 111 S.E. 517, (N.C. 1922)
  • Vaughan v. . Fallin 111 S.E. 513, (N.C. 1922)
  • Brooks v. . Mills Co. 111 S.E. 515, (N.C. 1922)
  • State v. . Hauser 111 S.E. 349, (N.C. 1922)
  • ACME Manufacturing Co. v. Tucker & Nobles 111 S.E. 525, (N.C. 1922)
  • State v. . Jessup 111 S.E. 523, (N.C. 1922)
  • Board of Education v. Board of Commissioners of Johnston County 111 S.E. 531, (N.C. 1922)
  • Lane & Co. v. Central Engineering Co. 111 S.E. 344, (N.C. 1922)
  • Craver v. Durham Hotel Corp. 111 S.E. 533, (N.C. 1922)
  • Brooks v. Orange Rice Mill Co. 183 N.C. 677, (N.C. 1922)
  • State v. . Freshwater 111 S.E. 161, (N.C. 1922)
  • Holly Springs Land & Improvement Co. v. Brewer 111 S.E. 161, (N.C. 1922)
  • Armour Fertilizer Works v. Simpson 111 S.E. 341, (N.C. 1922)
« Prev 1 … 4 5 6 7 8 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑