Continental Aluminum Co. v. Stone
Continental Aluminum Co. v. Stone
124 S.E. 923; 188 N.C. 827; 1924 N.C. LEXIS 210
(South Eastern Reporter)
Continental Aluminum Co. v. Stone
Opinion of the Court
A careful perusal of the present record leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried substantially in agreement with the law bearing on the subject, and that the validity of the trial should be sustained. All matters in dispute have been settled by the verdict, and no action or ruling on the part of the trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held for reversible error. The court’s charge on the burden of proof is supported by the case of Tobacco Growers Assn. v. Moss, 187 N. C., 421.
The verdict and judgment will be upheld.
No error.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.