The controversy on trial narrowed itself to issues of fact, which the jury alone could determine. A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the case has been heard and determined substantially in agreement with the law bearing on the subject, and that the validity of the trial should be sustained. All matters in dispute have been settled by the verdict, and no action or ruling on the part of the trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held for reversible or prejudicial error.

It would only be a work of supererogation and repetition to discuss the exceptions, seriatim, as they present no new or novel point of law not heretofore settled by our decisions. The verdict and judgment will' be upheld.

No error.