Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1925

State v. . Flood

State v. . Flood
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided September 16, 1925 · PER CURIAM.
129 S.E. 145; 190 N.C. 848; 1925 N.C. LEXIS 190 (South Eastern Reporter)

State v. . Flood

Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

The defendant in apt time moved to set aside the verdict on the ground of newly discovered evidence. His Honor heard oral testimony not available to the defendant at the trial and in his discretion denied the motion. In this, we find no error. The motion, of course, cannot be entertained in this Court. S. v. Jenkins, 182 N. C., 818. The demurrer to the evidence and the motion to vacate the verdict on the ground that the State’s evidence was insufficient were properly overruled. There are no other assignments of error.

No error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.