Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1925

State v. . Hughes

State v. . Hughes
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided March 11, 1925 · PER CURIAM.
126 S.E. 926; 189 N.C. 831; 1925 N.C. LEXIS 413 (South Eastern Reporter)

State v. . Hughes

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The only assignment of error is based upon defendants’ exception to the refusal of the court' to allow their motion, ■ at the close of all the evidence, for judgment of nonsuit. C. S., 4643. We do not deem it necessary to set out the evidence, which is stated in the case on appeal. The testimony of the witness, if found by the jury to be true, was sufficient evidence to sustain the allegations of the indictment. There was no error in the refusal of defendants’ motion. No other error is assigned by defendants. The evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict. Upon the whole record there is

No error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.