We have beard tbe arguments, read tbe record and briefs witb care, and can find no prejudicial or reversible error. There was sufficient competent evidence to support tbe material findings of fact by tbe learned judge in tbe court below wbo beard tbis motion. Upon tbe findings of fact, wbicb we are bound by, we think tbe judgment of tbe court below correct. There is no new or novel principle of law involved in tbe controversy. Tbe judgment of tbe court below is

Affirmed.