Western Carolina Power Co. v. Klutz
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Nichols v. Goldston (N.C. 1950)
- Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Hood (N.C. 1945)
- Howard v. Queen City Coach Co. (N.C. 1937)
- Grimes v. . Fulton (N.C. 1929)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Even if it be conceded that the present proceeding cannot properly be consolidated for trial with the three other condemnation proceedings pending in the Superior Court of Catawba County as petitioner alleges — which question is not presented and therefore not decided — still the motion to remove, on the grounds stated, “for the convenience of witnesses and to promote the ends of justice,” 0. S., 470, rests in the sound discretion of the trial court, and is not reviewable on appeal. Perry v. Perry, 172 N. C., 62, 89 S. E., 999; Byrd v. Spruce Co., 170 N. C., 429, 87 S. E., 241; Garrett v. Bear, 144 N. C., 23, 56 S. E., 479.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.