Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928

Middleton v. Hunter

Middleton v. Hunter
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided April 4, 1928 · Qlaekson
195 N.C. 418
Middleton v. Hunter

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision. The 2 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

QlaeksoN, J.

We think the court below was in error in excluding the evidence objected to. It was competent to be submitted to the jury on the issue as to whether the plaintiff was the owner of the note sued on in due course.

It is well settled that admissions in pleadings are competent evidence. Even admissions of attorneys of record. Although the admissions are in another action, they are declarations of the party. Morris v. Bogue Corporation, 194 N. C., p. 279, and cases cited. The probative force is for the jury. For the reasons given, there must be a

New trial.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.