Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928

Moore v. Schwartz

Moore v. Schwartz
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided May 2, 1928 · Cubiam
195 N.C. 549

Moore v. Schwartz

Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam.

Gaming contracts are covered by C. S., 2142. Such contracts are void and cannot be enforced in a court of justice. Orvis v. Holt, 173 N. C., 231; Bank v. Crafton, 181 N. C., 404.

Under certain circumstances the holder of a check or a note given to pay a gambling debt may recover against the endorser. Bank v. Crafton, supra. This is not such a ease as the endorser is not sued.

No error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.