Moore v. Schwartz

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Moore v. Schwartz, 195 N.C. 549 (N.C. 1928)
Cubiam

Moore v. Schwartz

Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam.

Gaming contracts are covered by C. S., 2142. Such contracts are void and cannot be enforced in a court of justice. Orvis v. Holt, 173 N. C., 231; Bank v. Crafton, 181 N. C., 404.

Under certain circumstances the holder of a check or a note given to pay a gambling debt may recover against the endorser. Bank v. Crafton, supra. This is not such a ease as the endorser is not sued.

No error.

Reference

Full Case Name
JOHN W. MOORE v. ISRAEL SCHWARTZ
Status
Published