Moore v. Schwartz
Moore v. Schwartz
195 N.C. 549
Moore v. Schwartz
Opinion of the Court
Gaming contracts are covered by C. S., 2142. Such contracts are void and cannot be enforced in a court of justice. Orvis v. Holt, 173 N. C., 231; Bank v. Crafton, 181 N. C., 404.
Under certain circumstances the holder of a check or a note given to pay a gambling debt may recover against the endorser. Bank v. Crafton, supra. This is not such a ease as the endorser is not sued.
No error.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.