In re of Bauguess

Supreme Court of North Carolina
In re of Bauguess, 196 N.C. 278 (N.C. 1928)
Clarkson

In re of Bauguess

Opinion of the Court

ClaRksoN, J.

C. S., 2591, in regard to reopening sales on advance bids, wben real estate is sold under mortgages or deeds of trust, etc., is interpreted in In re Ware, 187 N. C., 693, and cases cited. See, also, Trust Co. v. Powell, 189 N. C., 372; Newby v. Gallop, 193 N. C., 244; Cherry v. Gilliam, 195 N. C., 233.

In Cherry v. Gilliam, supra, at p. 234, it was said that C. S., 2591, “confers no power on the clerk to make any orders unless the bid is increased.”

The plaintiff’s remedy was by an action. The motion is dismissed.

Error.

Reference

Full Case Name
In the Matter of W. R. BAUGUESS, Trustee, and the BANK OF DAMASCUS
Status
Published