Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1929

State v. . Cornett

State v. . Cornett
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided October 30, 1929 · Adams
150 S.E. 113; 197 N.C. 627; 1929 N.C. LEXIS 319 (South Eastern Reporter)
State v. . Cornett

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Adams, J".

The defendants were indicted and convicted of wilfully injuring and removing a fence surrounding a cultivated field in breach of C. S., 4317. Judgment was suspended, upon payment of the cost, until the termination of a pending civil action. The order for the payment of the cost is not a part of the punishment which may be imposed for the commission of a misdemeanor, the legal effect of the order being only to vest the right to the cost in those entitled to it. S. v. Crook, 115 N. C., 760; S. v. Smith, 196 N. C., 438. As no final judgment has been pronounced, the appeal must be dismissed. In a criminal action an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment on conviction or from one which in its nature is final. S. v. Bailey, 65 N. C., 426; S. v. Jefferson, 66 N. C., 309; S. v. Wiseman, 68 N. C., 203; S. v. Webb, 155 N. C., 426; S. v. Tripp, 168 N. C., 150.

Appeal dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.