Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1929

State v. . Cornett

State v. . Cornett
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided October 30, 1929 · Adams
150 S.E. 113; 197 N.C. 627; 1929 N.C. LEXIS 319 (South Eastern Reporter)

State v. . Cornett

Opinion of the Court

Adams, J".

The defendants were indicted and convicted of wilfully injuring and removing a fence surrounding a cultivated field in breach of C. S., 4317. Judgment was suspended, upon payment of the cost, until the termination of a pending civil action. The order for the payment of the cost is not a part of the punishment which may be imposed for the commission of a misdemeanor, the legal effect of the order being only to vest the right to the cost in those entitled to it. S. v. Crook, 115 N. C., 760; S. v. Smith, 196 N. C., 438. As no final judgment has been pronounced, the appeal must be dismissed. In a criminal action an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment on conviction or from one which in its nature is final. S. v. Bailey, 65 N. C., 426; S. v. Jefferson, 66 N. C., 309; S. v. Wiseman, 68 N. C., 203; S. v. Webb, 155 N. C., 426; S. v. Tripp, 168 N. C., 150.

Appeal dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.