An examination of the record in this appeal does not disclose prejudicial error in any decision by the court below in a matter of law or legal inference for which a new trial should be ordered by this Court.

The evidence pertinent to the questions involved in the determinative issues was submitted to the jury under instructions which are in accord with authoritative decisions of this Court. This evidence, consisting largely of the diverse opinions of witnesses, as is usual in proceedings of this nature, was conflicting. The jury having answered the issues contrary to the contentions of the propounders, the judgment in accordance with the verdict must be affirmed. We find

No error.