Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1929

Rutledge v. . Fitzgerald

Rutledge v. . Fitzgerald
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided May 1, 1929 · PER CURIAM.
147 S.E. 816; 197 N.C. 163; 1929 N.C. LEXIS 178 (South Eastern Reporter)

Rutledge v. . Fitzgerald

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The defendant did not request the court below to find the facts upon which the rulings of the court below were based. In the absence of such finding, it is presumed that the court below, upon proper evidence, found facts sufficient to support the judgment. The whole matter is fully discussed and decisions cited in Holcomb v. Holcomb, 192 N. C., 504; Helderman v. Mills Co., 192 N. C., 626. See Lumber Co. v. Anderson, 196 N. C., 474; Realty Corp. v. Fisher, 196 N. C., 503; Coach Co. v. Griffin, 196 N. C., 559. The judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.