Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1929

Black v. Black

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided November 27, 1929 · Cubiam

198 N.C. 809

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Goodman v. . Goodman (N.C. 1931)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per CubiaM.

The allegations of the complaint, which the judge finds to be true for the purposes of his order, are sufficient to warrant an *810allowance for tbe wife’s necessary subsistence and counsel fees as authorized by C. S., 1667, as amended by chapter 123, Public Laws 1921, and chapter 52, Public Laws 1923.

It would serve no useful purpose to set out the facts in detail. See Byerly v. Byerly, 194 N. C., 532, 140 S. E., 158; McManus v. McManus, 191 N. C., 740, 133 S. E., 9; Price v. Price, 188 N. C., 640, 125 S. E., 264; Allen v. Allen, 180 N. C., 465, 105 S. E., 11.

The order will be upheld.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.