Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /North Carolina /Cases /Supreme Court of North Carolina /

1929

504 Supreme Court of North Carolina opinions from 1929.

  • In re Will of Harris 149 S.E. 382, (N.C. 1929)
  • Elizabeth City Hotel Corp. v. Toxey 149 S.E. 922, (N.C. 1929)
  • Virginia-Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank v. Liles 149 S.E. 377, (N.C. 1929)
  • Greene County v. Snow Hill Railway Co. 149 S.E. 397, (N.C. 1929)
  • Walker v. Owens 197 N.C. 412, (N.C. 1929)
  • Morris v. Norfolk Southern Railroad 197 N.C. 788, (N.C. 1929)
  • Pierce Ex Rel. Schulken v. Pierce 148 S.E. 438, (N.C. 1929)
  • Twin City Motor Co. v. Rouzer Motor Co. 148 S.E. 461, (N.C. 1929)
  • Langford v. . Lumber Company 148 S.E. 457, (N.C. 1929)
  • Barbour v. County of Wake 148 S.E. 470, (N.C. 1929)
  • In re Will of Casey 148 S.E. 437, (N.C. 1929)
  • State v. . Freeman 148 S.E. 450, (N.C. 1929)
  • Jenkins v. Southern Railway Co. 148 S.E. 920, (N.C. 1929)
  • Austin v. Southern Railway Co. 148 S.E. 446, (N.C. 1929)
  • Stamey v. . Lumber Company 148 S.E. 436, (N.C. 1929)
  • McDaniel v. Trent Mills, Inc. 148 S.E. 440, (N.C. 1929)
  • Brown v. . Osteen 148 S.E. 434, (N.C. 1929)
  • Bostwick v. . Jackson 148 S.E. 927, (N.C. 1929)
  • Hemphill v. Standard Oil Co. 148 S.E. 443, (N.C. 1929)
  • Coxe v. . Dillard 148 S.E. 545, (N.C. 1929)
  • Hamilton v. . Henderson 148 S.E. 429, (N.C. 1929)
  • In re the Last Will & Testament of Shemwell 148 S.E. 469, (N.C. 1929)
  • Cathey v. City of Charlotte 148 S.E. 426, (N.C. 1929)
  • Morrison v. Southern States Finance Co. 148 S.E. 458, (N.C. 1929)
  • Poe & Benfield v. Gill 148 S.E. 430, (N.C. 1929)
  • Smith v. . Dicks 148 S.E. 464, (N.C. 1929)
  • Slaughter v. . Lumber Company 148 S.E. 460, (N.C. 1929)
  • State v. . Griggs 148 S.E. 547, (N.C. 1929)
  • Tull v. . Harvey 148 S.E. 425, (N.C. 1929)
  • Murchison National Bank v. Broadhurst 148 S.E. 452, (N.C. 1929)
  • Rhodes v. New York Life Insurance 148 S.E. 439, (N.C. 1929)
  • Brummitt, Attorney-General v. . R. R. 148 S.E. 444, (N.C. 1929)
  • Groves Mills, Inc. v. Carolina & Northwestern Railway Co. 148 S.E. 441, (N.C. 1929)
  • Ferguson v. . Martin 148 S.E. 448, (N.C. 1929)
  • In re the Administration of the Estate of Wallace 148 S.E. 456, (N.C. 1929)
  • State v. . Stansberry 148 S.E. 546, (N.C. 1929)
  • Urey v. Southern Fire Insurance 148 S.E. 432, (N.C. 1929)
  • Johnston v. Phoenix Utility Co. 148 S.E. 429, (N.C. 1929)
  • Tull v. Harvey & Son Co. 197 N.C. 329, (N.C. 1929)
  • Hamilton v. Henderson 197 N.C. 353, (N.C. 1929)
  • State v. Freeman 197 N.C. 376, (N.C. 1929)
  • State ex rel. Brummitt v. Snow Hill Railway Co. 197 N.C. 381, (N.C. 1929)
  • Stamey v. Suncrest Lumber Co. 148 S.E. 436, (N.C. 1929)
  • Slaughter v. Bemis Lumber Co. 197 N.C. 395, (N.C. 1929)
  • Langford v. Kitchen Lumber Co. 197 N.C. 396, (N.C. 1929)
  • Mull Ex Rel. Mull v. Mock 148 S.E. 925, (N.C. 1929)
  • Stanback v. Citizens National Bank of Raleigh 148 S.E. 313, (N.C. 1929)
  • Peeler v. United States Casualty Co. 148 S.E. 261, (N.C. 1929)
  • Frick Company v. . Shelton 148 S.E. 318, (N.C. 1929)
  • Noland v. City of Asheville 148 S.E. 249, (N.C. 1929)
« Prev 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 … 11 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑