Shepherd v. . Refining Company
Shepherd v. . Refining Company
153 S.E. 927; 198 N.C. 824
(South Eastern Reporter)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Grantham v. . Grantham (N.C. 1933)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The nonsuit was entered on the theory that the plaintiff had failed to show a contract in writing, or any memorandum or *825 note thereof, signed by the party to be charged therewith, or by some other person by him thereto lawfully authorized, which described the property with sufficient definiteness to admit of identification as required by C. S., 988. In this we find no error.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.