At the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence, defendant moved for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. These motions were overruled, and in this we think there was no error.

We have read the record and the well prepared briefs of the able counsel with care. The court below gave defendant’s prayers for instructions. We think, from the facts in this case, the issues were the proper ones to have been submitted to the jury.

We see no error in the admission or exclusion of evidence during the ■trial, or in the charge of the court below. There is no new or novel proposition of law presented by. the record. It was mainly a question of fact for the jury to determine. They have answered the issues in favor of plaintiff. In a case of this kind, we have jurisdiction only to review upon appeal any decisions of the court below “upon any matter of law or legal inference.” We find in law

No error.