Jackson Ex Rel. Jackson v. Bell
Jackson Ex Rel. Jackson v. Bell
160 S.E. 283; 201 N.C. 336; 1931 N.C. LEXIS 232
(South Eastern Reporter)
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Tuttle v. . Bell (N.C. 1932)
- Weinstein v. City of Raleigh (N.C. 1941)
- Kelly v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. (N.C. 1936)
- LaNeve v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. (N.C. 1934)
- Mangum v. . Winstead (N.C. 1932)
- Baker v. . Clayton (N.C. 1932)
- Frazier v. Piedmont & Northern Railway Co. (N.C. 1931)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Without detailing the evidence it is sufficient to say that it falls short of making out a case against the defendant Porter. At least, the appellant, who is required to handle the laboring oar, has failed to overcome the presumption against error. Bailey v. McKay, 198 N. C., 638, 152 S. E., 893.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.