Roland v. Railway Express Agency
Roland v. Railway Express Agency
161 S.E. 483; 201 N.C. 815; 1931 N.C. LEXIS 109
(South Eastern Reporter)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Pridgen v. Carolina Coach Co. (N.C. 1948)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In the absence of any evidence tending to show that their agent was authorized by defendants to procure the warrant on which plaintiff was arrested and prosecuted, or that defendants ratified the action of their agent in procuring the warrant and prosecuting the plaintiff, this action was properly dismissed. Lamm v. Charles Stores Co., ante, 134, 159 S. E., 444. The judgment is
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.