Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931

Nebel v. . Nebel

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided November 25, 1931 · PER CURIAM.

161 S.E. 223; 201 N.C. 840; 1931 N.C. LEXIS 140 (South Eastern Reporter)

Cases that cite this one

10 later published cases cite this decision.

Parrish v. PIEDMONT PUBLISHING COMPANY (N.C. 1967)
McMahan v. . Basinger (N.C. 1937)
Allen v. Mutual Life Insurance (N.C. 1937)
Smith v. . Powell (N.C. 1935)
Trust Co v. . Hood, Comr. of Banks (N.C. 1934)
First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Hood ex rel. Central Bank & Trust Co. (N.C. 1934)
Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Maney (N.C. 1933)
McKamey v. . Blair (N.C. 1932)
Campbell v. . Hood, Commissioner of Banks (N.C. 1932)
McKamey v. Blair (N.C. 1932)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

This is an action brought by plaintiff against the defendant (1) for alimony without divorce (2) application for an allowance for subsistencependente lite. 3 C. S., 1667. The Court being evenly divided in opinion, one of the members, the ChiefJustice, not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed and stands as the decision of this action, without becoming a precedent. Goochv. Western Union Tel. Co., 196 N.C. 823; Tarboro v. Johnson, 196 N.C. 824;Parsons v. Board of Education, 200 N.C. 88; Durham v. Lloyd, 200 N.C. 803.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.