Warden v. . Andrews
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Warden v. . Andrews, 156 S.E. 508 (N.C. 1931)
200 N.C. 330; 1931 N.C. LEXIS 318
BrogdeN
Warden v. . Andrews
Opinion of the Court
An examination o-f the complaint discloses that the suit is instituted upon separate and independent contracts. Hence the complaint does not tell one connected story, nor do- the various causes of action affect all of the parties. Therefore, the trial judge ruled correctly in sustaining the demurrer. Quarry Co. v. Construction Co., 151 N. C., 345, 66 S. E., 217; Shore v. Holt, 185 N. C., 312, 117 S. E., 165; Bank v. Angelo, 193 N. C., 576, 137 S. E., 705; Sasser v. Bullard, 199 N. C., 562; McIntosh N. C. Practice and Procedure, 453.
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Paul Warden v. J. K. Andrews and Eugene Transou, Trading as Transou-Jordan Lumber Company.
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published