This is the second appeal in this case which was tried twice at the same term of Buncombe Superior Court.

The verdict rendered in the first trial was set aside by the judge, in the exercise of his discretion, because he regarded it as contrary to the weight of the evidence. To this ruling, the defendant objected, excepted, and noted an appeal.

When the case was called for trial again, later in the term, the defendant prayed that further proceedings be stayed until the appeal, previously taken, could be determined, and objected to entering upon another trial of the cause. For this position, he relies upon Bohannon v. Trust Co., 198 N. C., 702, 153 S. E., 263, Likas v. Lackey, 186 N. C., 398, 119 S. E., 763, Pruett v. Power Co., 167 N. C., 598, 83 S. E., 830; C. S., 655.

So long as the matter was in fieri, the keeping of the verdict resided in the breast of the judge, and he was at liberty, at any time during the term, in the exercise of a 'sound discretion, to set it aside and to award a new trial, from which ruling no appeal lies. Goodman v. Goodman, post, 808. Therefore, the court was'justified in disregarding the attempted appeal from the order vacating the verdict returned in the first trial. Likas v. Lackey, supra. The remaining exceptions are without substantial merit.

No error.