Hunt Manufacturing Co. v. Hudson

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Hunt Manufacturing Co. v. Hudson, 157 S.E. 799 (N.C. 1931)
200 N.C. 541; 1931 N.C. LEXIS 382
Stacy

Hunt Manufacturing Co. v. Hudson

Opinion of the Court

Stacy, C. J.

The National Surety Company takes the position that only one action, in the nature of a creditor’s bill, can be brought to enforce the surety’s liability on a contractor’s bond, given to a municipal corporation in connection with public work under C. S., 2445, as amended, and that such action, as provided therein, must “be brought in *543 tbe county in wbicb tbe building, road, or street is located, and not elsewhere.” Tbis is true, but tbe provisions of tbis statute would seem to be inapplicable to tbe present case.

In tbe first place, tbe plaintiff’s cause of action is not limited to recovery on tbe contractor’s bond. Another and independent agreement is set out and declared upon. In tbe second place, O. S., 2445, applies only to bonds given to municipal corporations, and while “Tbe Board of Trustees of tbe East Carolina Teachers’ College” is declared a body corporate by 3 C. S., 5863, such board, we apprehend, is not a municipal corporation within tbe purview of C. S., 2445. A similar bolding was made with respect to tbe North Carolina State Highway Commission in Trust Co. v. Highway Commission, 190 N. C., 680, 130 S. E., 547.

Tbe motion to dismiss tbe action was properly overruled.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Hunt Manufacturing Company v. john.W. Hudson, Jr., and the National Surety Company.
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published