Farmers Bank of Clayton v. McCullers

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Farmers Bank of Clayton v. McCullers, 200 N.C. 591 (N.C. 1931)
157 S.E. 869; 1931 N.C. LEXIS 391
Bkogden

Farmers Bank of Clayton v. McCullers

Opinion of the Court

BkogdeN, J.

The burden of proof upon the allegations in the co)m-plaint and amended complaint was upon the plaintiff, and in such cases the correct principles of practice forbid a directed instruction upon the pleadings in favor of the party upon whom the burden of proof rests. House v. R. R., 131 N. C., 103; Yarn Mills v. Armstrong, 191 N. C., 125. The record shows that in a counter-statement of case on appeal by the plaintiff it appears that the deeds from Nellie Horne McCullers to her husband were offered in evidence, and that said deeds show a failure to comply with C. S., 2515. However, it is obvious that the judgment was rendered upon the pleadings.

Error.

Reference

Full Case Name
FARMERS BANK OF CLAYTON v. NELLIE HORNE McCULLERS and Husband, DR. E. H. McCULLERS, and MELBA McCULLERS MISENHEIMER
Status
Published