Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931

Flinchum v. Doughton

Flinchum v. Doughton
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided May 13, 1931 · Stacy
200 N.C. 770
Flinchum v. Doughton

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Stacy, 0. J.

The defendant’s exceptions have not been passed upon either by the clerk or the judge, and under the order of continuance substantial rights are required to be waived to obtain a hearing of any kind. This is contrary to the usual course and practice of the courts. Carter v. Rountree, 109 N. C., 29, 13 S. E., 716. Furthermore, the order in question is not self-executing, and its terms, are conditional. Church v. Church, 158 N. C., 564, 74 S. E., 14. “Alternative or conditional judgments are void.” Lloyd v. Lumber Co., 167 N. C., 97, 83 S. E., 248.

The order will be vacated, to the end that further proceedings may he had as the law directs and the rights of the parties require.

Error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.