Watkins v. Ætna Life Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Watkins v. Ætna Life Insurance, 201 N.C. 681 (N.C. 1931)
Pee

Watkins v. Ætna Life Insurance

Opinion of the Court

Pee CuRiam.

The contract of insurance issued by the defendant to Pomona Mills, Inc., under which, plaintiff claims, was not offered in evidence. Nor does it appear that it was in force when plaintiff’s intestate left the Pomona Mills or when he died. The judgment of nonsuit was properly entered.

The order made by the judge allowing defendant to file answer, after statutory time for filing had expired, is supported by the decision in Howard v. Hinson, 191 N. C., 366, 131 S. E., 748.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
LULA WATKINS, Administratrix of J. H. WATKINS v. ÆTNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Status
Published