The record contains eleven assignments of error of which the second and sixth may be taken as illustrative:

Defendant assigns error:

“2. For that the court admitted the evidence over defendant’s objection as preserved in exceptions Nos. 2 and 3 (R. pp. 3 and 6).”

*845 “6. For that the court excluded the competent and material evidence important to the defendant as specifically set out in each exception, as preserved by defendant’s exceptions Nos. 24, 25, 26, 27, 29 and 30 (E. pp. 43, 44, 45, 46, 48, 49 and 50).”

These assignments of error are defective in that they give no indication of relevancy to the controversy; nor do they show any signs of pertinency to the questions sought to be presented. Greene v. Dishman, 202 N. C., 811; Baker v. Clayton, 202 N. C., 741. But notwithstanding their deficiency, a careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried in substantial conformity to the decisions on the subject.

No error.