Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932

Thompson v. . Hood, Commissioner of Banks

Thompson v. . Hood, Commissioner of Banks
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided November 2, 1932 · PER CURIAM.
166 S.E. 927; 203 N.C. 851; 1932 N.C. LEXIS 114 (South Eastern Reporter)

Thompson v. . Hood, Commissioner of Banks

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

There was sufficient evidence at tbe trial of tbis action to support tbe findings of fact made by tbe referee, and approved by tbe judge. These findings of fact are, therefore, conclusive.

β€œIt is settled by all tbe decisions on tbe subject, with none to tbe contrary, that tbe findings of fact, made by a referee, and approved by tbe trial judge, are not subject to review on appeal, if they are supported by any competent evidence.” Kenney v. Hotel Co., 194 N. C., 44, 138 S. E., 349.

Tbe judgment upon tbe facts set out in tbe report of tbe referee, is

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.