Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932

State Ex Rel. Parks v. Seagraves

State Ex Rel. Parks v. Seagraves
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided December 7, 1932 · Stacy
166 S.E. 747; 203 N.C. 647; 1932 N.C. LEXIS 61 (South Eastern Reporter)

State Ex Rel. Parks v. Seagraves

Opinion of the Court

Stacy, C. J.

The record recites “judgment signed,” but we are not advised as to its contents. The proceeding was denominated a criminal action in the justice’s court, and a civil action in the Superior Court. In the absence of the judgment, we cannot know whether it purports to be one rendered in a civil action or in a criminal prosecution.

Rule 19, sec. 1, provides that “the pleadings on which the case is tried, the issues, and the judgment appealed from shall be a part of the transcript in all cases.” The judgment of the Superior Court is not in the record. Everett v. Fair Association, 202 N. C., 838, 162 S. E., 896. It is the uniform practice to dismiss the appeal for failure to send up necessary parts of the record proper. Riggan v. Harrison, ante, 191; Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N. C., 788, 156 S. E., 126. It is the duty of appellant to see that the record is properly made up and transmitted. S. v. Frizell, 111 N. C., 722, 16 S. E., 409.

Appeal dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.