Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932

Beck v. . Halliwell

Beck v. . Halliwell
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided April 27, 1932 · PER CURIAM.
163 S.E. 927; 202 N.C. 846; 1932 N.C. LEXIS 272 (South Eastern Reporter)
Beck v. . Halliwell

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*847 . Pee Cubiam.

There was evidence at the trial of this action tending to show that defendant is liable to the plaintiff as an original promisor for the purchase price of the goods delivered by plaintiff to the corporation in which defendant was a stockholder. “It is too well settled to require the citation of sustaining authorities that the statute of frauds does not apply to the original promises or undertakings, though the benefit accrues to another than the promisor.” Hospital Association v. Hobbs, 153 N. C., 188, 69 S. E., 79.

Defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit was properly denied. The judgment is affirmed.

No error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.