McKeel v. . Latham
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Burrell v. DICKSON TRANSFER COMPANY (N.C. 1956)
- Hood, Comr. of Banks v. . Motor Co. (N.C. 1936)
- Oliver v. . Hood, Comr. of Banks (N.C. 1936)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The order of the judge of the Superior Court denying plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend bis complaint, was made in the exercise of bis discretion (C. S., 515) and is therefore not subject to review by this Court, on plaintiff’s appeal. There is no contention on the part of the appellant that there was an abuse of the discretion vested in the judge by the statute; at least, there is nothing in the record to sustain this contention.
It is well settled that no appeal lies to tbis Court from an order or judgment made or rendered by a judge of tbe Superior Court in tbe exercise of discretion vested in him by statute. Tbis appeal is therefore
Dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.