Bechtel v. . Weaver

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Bechtel v. . Weaver, 164 S.E. 338 (N.C. 1932)
202 N.C. 856; 1932 N.C. LEXIS 286
PER CURIAM.

Bechtel v. . Weaver

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

If it be conceded that the defendants’ plea in abatement should have been sustained (Brown v. Polk, 201 N. C., 375, 160 S. E., 357), still the correct result has been reached in another way, and the judgment will not be disturbed. Bank v. McCullers, 201 N. C., 440; Rankin v. Oates, 183 N. C., 517, 112 S. E., 32. “A new trial will not he granted when the action of the trial judge, even if erroneous, could by no possibility injure the appellant.” Butts v. Screws, 95 N. C., 215.

This disposition of the matter renders it unnecessary to consider defendants’ appeal.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
JOHN A. BECHTEL v. D. J. WEAVER Et Al.
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published