Pemberton v. City of Greensboro
Cases that cite this one
30 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Hill v. . Stansbury (N.C. 1942)
- Trust Co. v. . Dunlop (N.C. 1938)
- Virginia Trust Co. v. Dunlop (N.C. 1938)
- Penn Dixie Lines, Inc. v. Grannick (N.C. 1953)
- Weant v. McCanless (N.C. 1952)
- Fleming v. . Light Co. (N.C. 1948)
- Fleming v. Carolina Power & Light Co. (N.C. 1948)
- Williams v. . Thompson (N.C. 1947)
- Penny v. . Stone (N.C. 1947)
- Parrish v. . R. R. (N.C. 1942)
- Parrish v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad (N.C. 1942)
- Herndon v. . Massey (N.C. 1940)
- In re Disabarment of West (N.C. 1937)
- Ludwick v. . R. R. (N.C. 1937)
- Rucker v. . Snider Brothers, Inc. (N.C. 1937)
- Ludwick v. Southern Railway Co. (N.C. 1937)
- McDonald v. . Zimmerman (N.C. 1934)
- Harris Clay Co. v. Carolina China Clay Co. (N.C. 1933)
- Bynum v. . Bank (N.C. 1941)
- Bynum v. Fidelity Bank (N.C. 1941)
- Sayles v. . Loftis (N.C. 1940)
- Alamance Lumber Co. v. Edwards (N.C. 1940)
- City of Fayetteville v. Spur Distributing Co. (N.C. 1939)
- Town of Wadesboro v. Coxe (N.C. 1939)
- Duke Ex Rel. Duke v. Crippled Children's Commission, Inc. (N.C. 1938)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
It may be doubted whether the exception is sufficiently definite to enable us to review the different specifications, but however this may be, it is not discernible from the record that any harm has *515 come, or is likely to come, to the defendant by reason of the court’s ruling. Hosiery Mill v. Hosiery Mill, 198 N. C., 596, 152 S. E., 794; Ellis v. Ellis, ibid., 767, 153 S. E., 449.
It is readily conceded that nothing ought to be in a complaint, or remain there over objection, which is not competent to be shown on the hearing. C. S., 506; 21 R. C. L., 452. But the matter can better be determined after the bill of particulars has been filed. S. v. Lumber Co., 199 N. C., 199, 154 S. E., 72. See, Hines v. Rocky Mount, 162 N. C., 409, 78 S. E., 510, for scope of recoverable damages.
. As no substantial right, of which the defendant can apparently complain, has presently been affected or impaired, the judgment will not be disturbed. C. S., 537; McIntosh, N. C. P. & P., 378.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.