Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932

Moore v. . Boone

Moore v. . Boone
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided March 9, 1932 · PER CURIAM.
162 S.E. 769; 202 N.C. 838; 1932 N.C. LEXIS 261 (South Eastern Reporter)

Moore v. . Boone

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

A consideration of the record proper, to which we are limited in the absence of a statement of case on appeal, In re Bank, ante, 251; Casualty Co. v. Green, 200 N. C., 535, 157 S. E., 797, does not show that appellant has overcome the presumption against error. Bailey v. McKay, 198 N. C., 638, 152 S. E., 893. To prevail on appeal, he who alleges error must successfully handle the laboring oar. Mangum v. Winstead, ante, 252; Frazier v. R. R., ante, 11.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.