Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932

Crane v. . Carswell

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided November 23, 1932 · PER CURIAM.

166 S.E. 746; 203 N.C. 555; 1932 N.C. LEXIS 34 (South Eastern Reporter)

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

Pettes v. Jones (N.M. 1937)
Brown v. Bass (N.C. 1964)
Butler v. . Gantt (N.C. 1942)
Butler v. Gantt (N.C. 1942)
Bullard v. . Ross (N.C. 1933)
Baird v. . Ball (N.C. 1933)
Bullard v. Ross (N.C. 1933)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The contributory negligence of the plaintiff bars his recovery although damages were assessed upon the third issue. Baker v. R. R., 118 N. C., 1015; Sasser v. Lumber Co., 165 N. C., 242; McKoy v. Craven, 198 N. C., 780; Allen v. Yarborough, 201 N. C., 568. We find' nothing inconsistent in the verdict and his Honor’s refusal to set it aside as a matter of discretion is not reviewable.

There is no reversible error in the instruction complained of. The ordinance referred to is practically the same as the State law. Code, 1931, sec. 2621(58).

No error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.