Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932

In re the Bank of Whiteville

In re the Bank of Whiteville
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided February 17, 1932 · Stacy
202 N.C. 251

In re the Bank of Whiteville

Opinion of the Court

Stacy, C. J.

The granting or refusing a continuance, which involves no question of law or legal inference, is not subject to review on appeal. C. S., 560; Dupree v. Insurance Co., 92 N. C., 418. Hence, following the course pursued in Goodman v. Goodman, 201 N. C., 808, 161 S. E., 686, and Bird v. Bradburn, 131 N. C., 488, 42 S. E., 936, the appeal will be dismissed.

Furthermore, as the record contains no statement of case on appeal, we are limited to a consideration of the judgment, the appeal itself being regarded as an exception thereto. Casualty Co. v. Green, 200 N. C., 535, 157 S. E., 797. No reason appears on the face of the record proper for disturbing the judgment.

Appeal dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.