Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932

Lohr ex rel. Lohr v. Rothrock ex rel. Rothrock

Lohr ex rel. Lohr v. Rothrock ex rel. Rothrock
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided January 27, 1932
202 N.C. 823

Lohr ex rel. Lohr v. Rothrock ex rel. Rothrock

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the defendants made a motion in the court below for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The motion was granted and in this we think there was error.

We have read with care the evidence of plaintiff and think it sufficient to be submitted to a jury. We will not-set it forth or discuss the law, as the case goes back to be heard before a jury. There must be a

New trial.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.