Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933

Marriner v. . Mizzelle

Marriner v. . Mizzelle
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided September 20, 1933 · PER CURIAM.
170 S.E. 650; 205 N.C. 204; 1933 N.C. LEXIS 504 (South Eastern Reporter)
Marriner v. . Mizzelle

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Pes Cukiak.

It does not appear from the pleadings in this proceeding that the surety on the bond filed by plaintiff as guardian is a necessary party to this proceeding. It is not alleged in the answer filed by the defendants that there has been a breach of the bond. At most the surety is only a proper party. The motion of the defendants that the surety be made a party was addressed to the discretion of the court. McIntosh N. C. Practice & Procedure, page 185. For this reason, the refusal of the court to- allow the motion is not reviewable by this Court. The appeal by the defendants is

Dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.