Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933

Tiedemann v. . Tiedemann

Tiedemann v. . Tiedemann
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided May 24, 1933 · PER CURIAM.
169 S.E. 422; 204 N.C. 682; 1933 N.C. LEXIS 236 (South Eastern Reporter)

Tiedemann v. . Tiedemann

Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

The facts found by the judge are set out in his order. These facts are sufficient to support the order. There was evidence at the hearing tending to sustain the findings of fact. The amounts which the defendant is required to pay for the reasonable subsistence of plaintiff, pendente lite, and for compensation to her counsel were determined by the judge in the exercise of his sound discretion. They are not subject to review by this Court. Anderson v. Anderson, 183 N. C., 139, 110 S. E., 863. They may be modified at any time before the trial of the action upon the application of either party. C. S., 1667. The order is

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.